Current:Home > MarketsFederal judge grants injunction suspending NCAA's NIL rules-VaTradeCoin
Federal judge grants injunction suspending NCAA's NIL rules
View Date:2025-01-08 16:32:55
The NCAA will have to punt on enforcing its name, image, and likeness restrictions for now, due to a preliminary injunction granted Friday in a lawsuit against the organization.
The 13-page memorandum signed by U.S. District Judge Clifton Corker found that an NCAA policy banning college recruits from discussing NIL opportunities before they enroll in university caused "irreparable harm" to student-athletes.
"Without relief, the NCAA will continue to deprive Plaintiff States' athletes of information about the market value for their NIL rights, thereby preventing them from obtaining full, fair-market value for those rights," the opinion states. "Their labor generates massive revenues for the NCAA, its members, and other constituents in the college athletics industry — none of whom would dare accept such anticompetitive restrictions on their ability to negotiate their own rights. Those athletes shouldn't have to either."
The antitrust lawsuit, filed by the states of Tennessee and Virginia in January, argues that the NCAA is violating the Sherman Act by unfairly restricting how athletes commercially use NIL.
Following a 2021 Supreme Court ruling, the NCAA changed its policies to allow college athletes and recruits to earn money through extracurricular means, such as endorsement deals and personal appearances, as long as they remain consistent with state laws. However, according to CBS Sports, under the NCAA's policies, universities cannot recruit either high school athletes or transfer portal entrants using NIL opportunities.
"The NCAA is thumbing its nose at the law. After allowing NIL licensing to emerge nationwide, the NCAA is trying to stop that market from functioning," the lawsuit states.
It goes on to argue that the organization's ban on prospective athletes discussing NIL limits competition and decreases compensation levels versus a true free market.
The states seek a permanent injunction "barring the NCAA from enforcing its NIL-recruiting ban or taking any other action to prevent prospective college athletes and transfer candidates from engaging in meaningful NIL discussions prior to enrollment."
The preliminary injunction issued Friday restrains the NCAA from enforcing any NIL compensation restrictions until a full and final decision is reached.
In a statement Friday evening provided to CBS Sports, the NCAA said that "turning upside down rules overwhelmingly supported by member schools will aggravate an already chaotic collegiate environment, further diminishing protections for student-athletes from exploitation. The NCAA fully supports student-athletes making money from their name, image and likeness and is making changes to deliver more benefits to student-athletes, but an endless patchwork of state laws and court opinions make clear partnering with Congress is necessary to provide stability for the future of all college athletes."
- In:
- Sports
- College Basketball
- NCAA College Sports
- College Football
- NCAA
Rishi Rajagopalan is a social media associate producer and content writer for CBS News.
veryGood! (334)
Related
- Tesla issues 6th Cybertruck recall this year, with over 2,400 vehicles affected
- And the award goes to AI ft. humans: the Grammys outline new rules for AI use
- Megan Rapinoe Announces Plans to Retire From Professional Soccer
- Britney Spears Condemns Security Attack as Further Evidence of Her Not Being Seen as an Equal Person
- Who will save Florida athletics? Gators need fixing, and it doesn't stop at Billy Napier
- Untangling John Mayer's Surprising Dating History
- Untangling All the Controversy Surrounding Colleen Ballinger
- OceanGate wants to change deep-sea tourism, but its missing sub highlights the risks
- Princess Kate to host annual Christmas carol service following cancer treatment
- Untangling All the Controversy Surrounding Colleen Ballinger
Ranking
- Judge sets April trial date for Sarah Palin’s libel claim against The New York Times
- California Had a Watershed Climate Year, But Time Is Running Out
- Watch Carlee Russell press conference's: Police give update on missing Alabama woman
- A Petroleum PR Blitz in New Mexico
- Federal judge denies request to block measure revoking Arkansas casino license
- The first debt ceiling fight was in 1953. It looked almost exactly like the one today
- Is now the time to buy a car? High sticker prices, interest rates have many holding off
- The U.S. dollar conquered the world. Is it at risk of losing its top spot?
Recommendation
-
College Football Playoff bracket: Complete playoff picture after latest rankings
-
Coming this Summer: Spiking Electricity Bills Plus Blackouts
-
Taylor Swift Reunites With Taylor Lautner in I Can See You Video and Onstage
-
Inside Clean Energy: Think Solar Panels Don’t Work in Snow? New Research Says Otherwise
-
3 Iraqis tortured at Abu Ghraib win $42M judgement against defense contractor
-
LGBTQ+ creatives rely on Pride Month income. This year, they're feeling the pinch
-
When big tech laid off these H-1B workers, a countdown began
-
Birmingham honors the Black businessman who quietly backed the Civil Rights Movement